home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: bdt.com!usenet
- From: plew@dial-up.bdt.com (paul lew)
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.comp.virus,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.unixware.misc
- Subject: Re: Will anyone buy NT?? (Yes - Intelligent People)
- Date: 2 Feb 1996 03:20:17 GMT
- Organization: Beckemeyer Development, Oakland CA
- Message-ID: <4ervth$k0u@bdt.bdt.com>
- References: <4ef48q$rik@news.iag.net> <4egn0k$3d1g@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4eh3mr$p0b@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <4eo1pn$nn8@ralph.vnet.net>
- Reply-To: plew@dial-up.bdt.com (paul lew)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: crane.dial-up.bdt.com
- X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2
-
- In <4eo1pn$nn8@ralph.vnet.net>, cneal@vnet.net writes:
- : In <4eh3mr$p0b@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com: , jmrubin@ix.netcom.com (Joel Rubin) writes:
- : : In article <4egn0k$3d1g@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net: , regards@ibm.net says...
- :
- : : OS/2 and Win95 share one big problem which NT doesn't. While each app
- : : (or at least each 32-bit app in Win95) has its own address space, there
- : : is critical O/S data and code in Win95 and OS/2 which are visible in the
- : : address space of each app. Thus, an ill-behaved app can, in OS/2 or 95,
- : : overwrite operating system junk and bring down the house.
- :
- : Operating system memory space is not visible to an OS/2 programmer, unless
- : he is writing a ring 0 device driver. The example you gave ony works on some
- : machines with a hardware bug, and doesn't work by overwriting system
- : memory.
- :
- :
-
- I've "brought down the house" just by changing the path in the system setup;
- guess that makes nt ill behaved?
-
-